|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Professor: Lakshman Yapa Lectures Tuesday and Thursday 11:15-12:05 (273 Willard) Download the Fall 2006 Syllabus Here Download the Fall 2006 Semester Project Description Here Course Outline I present regional analysis through three paradigms: spatial analysis, relational analysis, and discourse theory. Spatial analysis is done by using the conventional tools of GIS such as map overlay and buffering, focusing on geographic locations of objects, that is, on "where" things are. Relational analysis looks at connection among variables and considers "how" objects are connected regardless of "where" they may be located. Discourse theory argues that such social concepts as race, class, ethnicity, poverty, community, and neighborhoods are not naively-given entities simply available to neutral, objective analysis. The understanding of such entities are greatly influenced by the discourses (or conversations) we have constructed about them. Therefore, analysis of such social objects must incorporate a sensitivity to how they are in fact "constructed" by discourses about them. Using discourse theory I argue social problems such as poverty do not have "root causes." In fact social problems are constituted from actions that take place simultaneously at a large number of sites diffused throughout the larger society. To address social problems we require methodologies that can keep track of, and analyze, large quantities of information. In that sense GIS is a complementary tool of our third paradigm of regional analysis--the discursive approach to social problems. In this class we shall approach the topics of region and regional analysis by systematically building on all three paradigms: spatial, relational, and discursive. These arguments will be developed at length, by example, through a series of lab and homework exercises. Course Text Semester Project Your project will be graded on the following scale: Project Proposal (10%) + GIS component (60%) + Written Report (30%) The project timeline is as follows:
Grading Policy Letter grades are based on the following scheme: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||